Comparative Bony Union Time Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Plate Implants
نویسندگان
چکیده
Objective: To determine the comparative and effective applicability of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS), proximal femoral plate (PFP) in terms rapid bony union complications for treating unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Methodology: This study was conducted at Department Orthopedic surgery, Pakistan Institute Medical Sciences, Islamabad during a period 8 months from August 2016 to April 2017. Patients ages 45 90 years, with close fresh fractures (one week) either gender were included. All patients divided into two groups. group A underwent PFP treatment B DHS treatment. followed up after 6 weeks then every 2 weekly afterwards total 3 assessment both clinically radiologically. The data collected on pre-structured Performa, analysis done using SPSS version 26. Results: 84 analysed, average age 66.57 ± 11.71 years 70.14 9.03 years. Females found majority No till six groups, while 2nd month followup, significantly high 19.0% cases group, compared 2.4% (p-0.014). On 2.5th rate higher 59.5% 7.1% (p-0.014), 3rd followup almost all groups (p-0.557) overall duration lower (p-0.001). Conclusion: technique observed be more significant minimum (DHS).
منابع مشابه
Type II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw(DHS)
Background: Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common fractures of the hip especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low-energy trauma like simple falls. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is still considered the gold standard for treating intertrochanteric fractures by many. Not many studies compare the DHS with Proximal femoral nail (PFN), in Type II intertrochanteri...
متن کاملProximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
PURPOSE To compare the outcome in patients who underwent surgery for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures using the proximal femoral locking plate versus the dynamic hip screw (DHS). METHODS 15 men and 5 women aged 32 to 78 (mean, 55) years were randomised to the proximal femoral locking plate group, whereas 14 men and 6 women aged 38 to 75 (mean, 59) years were randomised to the conv...
متن کاملA comparative study of proximal femoral fracture fixation with proximal femoral nail and Dynamic hip screw & plating
Introduction: Trochanteric fractures are one of the commonest injuries sustained predominantly in patients over sixty years of age. They are three to four times more common in women than in men. These usually occur through bone affected by osteoporosis; trivial fall being the most common mechanism of injury [1]. Discussion: The goal of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of patien...
متن کاملDynamic hip screw with locked plate VRS Proximal Femoral Nail for the management of intertrochanteric fracture: A comparative study
Dynamic hip screw has long been a standard implant for intertrochanteric hip fractures. The inception of intramedullary nails has further revolutionized their management. With a constant evolution in the designs of both these implants, there has always been a conflict concerning the superiority of one over the other. In this randomized prospective cohort study, 80 patients with intertrochanteri...
متن کاملLetter to the editor: Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Dhamangaonkar et al.1 May the authors clarify the following points. 1. A dynamic hip screw (DHS) with fixed angle locking screws reduces the risk of implant failure, particularly for patients with osteoporotic bone or less stable fracture configurations.2 Why did the authors compare a proximal femoral locking plate with a non-locking 135o DHS?...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1815-2287', '2075-7247']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v18i1.487